My Board
Tambayan ng mga Chicx at Tsonx => General Discussion => Love & Relationship => Topic started by: lilrj23 on July 08, 2013, 04:22:48 PM
-
This question is really bothering me. Bakit nga ba?
-
ganun ba tol....? hindi ko ata alam yan ah... mabait kc ako eh.... lol
ask natin mga babae
-
According to Prof. Steven Pinker of Harvard:
I’m not an expert in the phenomena, but here are some relevant considerations. From an evolutionary perspective, female mate choice should be affected both by a desire for good genes (where “good” means “likely to reproduce”) as well as paternal investment in the woman’s children. These need not coincide; hence some women have affairs with the strongest, smartest, best-looking man available, while being married to the nicest and most reliable man available. There is some evidence that women are more attracted to hypermasculine men when they are ovulating (when good genes are paramount) and to nice guys when they are not. There is also evidence that less desirable women are less choosy in terms of the willingness and ability of a man to provide for her and her children, and hence at least in relative terms more attracted to dashing qualities than to stable ones. Note too that the most desirable man of all, in many woman’s eyes, is “tough-tender” – nice to her, aggressive with everyone else.
Toughness can be attractive for several reasons. One is that it can reflect overall genetic quality – health, smarts, strength (this would be especially true in ancestral contexts where the land and money and power went to the best warriror, not to the smartest lawyer). Another is that it can protect the woman and her children against rapists, abductors, and so on. Probably most relevant is that he promises to give her tough sons. A woman’s son has to compete against other women’s sons, and if he is beaten up or publicly humiliated or cuckolded or killed, he will have less of a chance to reproduce. Of course all these have to be traded off against how good he is to her and her kids, but as mentioned, I predict that most women would prefer tough-to-others-nice-to-her than tough-to-everyone, though some may have to settle for the latter as a second choice.
-
nice answer sir zzgundam....may katwiran si Prf. Steven Pinker... kasi most of the time ang mga babae, gusto nila yung mga lalaking matatapang parang nagbibigay sa kanila ng sense of protection....
+1K sa'yo sir
-
Gusto kasi ng dominance sa part ng lalaki. Yun tipo kaya sila ihandle ng mga guys. Saka sign din kasi ng alpha male ang security sa kanila..
Sent from my Pandoras Box using Rainbow Tapatalk
-
:-\ depende siguro sa term ng "bad boy".... baka naman pusakal na walang hiya or hoodlum na pala yan eh nagugustuhan pa ng mga babae... maybe what is being referred here is yung medyo bastos ng kaunti, sample nyan siguro sina erap estrada and robin padilla... i have known this two celebs as really gentlemen in person... identity lang nila ang maging parang basagulero pero mga mababait sila in person...
parang may kiliti sa mga babae ang pagiging brusko ng isang lalaki... parang ang feeling nila na lalaking lalaki ang kanilang natitipuhan... honga naman, baka mag-ala rustom padilla at carmina villaruel sila hahahaha....