My Board
Academics => Legal Department => Topic started by: gelyn on April 19, 2013, 11:12:57 PM
-
Curious lang, kase napansin ko na meron yung site na www dot ***** dot com na lahat ng articles nya eh puro kopya sa articles ng ibang site. Hindi ba illegal yung ganun? Kase parang yung work ng iba eh pinu publish nya as his own tapos pinopost sa mga forum. Saan ba pwedeng i report ang ganun. Parang against copyright ata yun especially kung lahat ng articles eh kopya.
-
yeah illegal po yan.. lalo na kinukuha nila ang credit ng article.. ireport mo na lang po sa admin
-
Haha. sana may magreport dun sa mga copyright sites. Napaka plagiarism kase. Kunwari mag popost ng article, tapos isasama yung site. pag tsinek mo yung site eh hindi naman nila mga original articles. Kunwari nakikipag discussion yun pala spam.
-
First of all Ms. Gelyn... we dont advertise site here so I modify your message you can ask question naman w/o giving certain site... we dont ignite other sites issue here... if you have problem sa laman ng ibang site as fayt advice go direct to their admin lalo na kung may matibay ka na ebidensya na plagiarism ang ginagawa nya or SPAMMING.--
Yes illegal po ang pangongopya or pagpublish ng gawa ng iba but yet its case to case basis....saka kung mapaptunayan nyo po.. here in our site we have certain rules about that... read our board rules...
-
Haha. sana may magreport dun sa mga copyright sites. Napaka plagiarism kase. Kunwari mag popost ng article, tapos isasama yung site. pag tsinek mo yung site eh hindi naman nila mga original articles. Kunwari nakikipag discussion yun pala spam.
Risky din yan aside sa illegal, Google and Yahoo hates plagiarism kaya my tendency na kahit anong search d yan lalabas sa search engine.
-
yes
yes
yes
at yes
-
generally illegal po yan pero ayon sa batas, may exceptions. for example if yung article states facts or news reports, pwede pa din yan ipublish ng iba. may Fair Use doctrine din tayong tinatawag which limits the exclusive rights given to the author for his work.
-
generally illegal po yan pero ayon sa batas, may exceptions. for example if yung article states facts or news reports, pwede pa din yan ipublish ng iba. may Fair Use doctrine din tayong tinatawag which limits the exclusive rights given to the author for his work.
Agree ako dito, meron pa sa US na tinatawag na PLR or Private Label Rights, yung kahit sino pwede i claim na kanya yung article pero bawal kang may baguhin.
-
Big yes... Claiming the rights over certain PUBLISHED article is a big NO. you can use citation if you prefer to use others work... Basic rule is to give credit to the author...
-
Curious lang, kase napansin ko na meron yung site na www dot ***** dot com na lahat ng articles nya eh puro kopya sa articles ng ibang site. Hindi ba illegal yung ganun? Kase parang yung work ng iba eh pinu publish nya as his own tapos pinopost sa mga forum. Saan ba pwedeng i report ang ganun. Parang against copyright ata yun especially kung lahat ng articles eh kopya.
It depends, kailangang I-Qualify po ito.
Kung yung mga kinopyang articles ay na Publish na:
"Published Works" are defined as works, which, with the consent of the authors, are made available to the public by wire or wireless means in such a way that members of the public may access these works from a place and time individually chosen by them.(Part IV Chapter I Sec.171 (171.7) RA 8293)
Example ay mga written articles published over the cyberspace, the general rule is that if you copy without permission, you will be liable for copyright infringement.
Please take note that not all "Published" works are protected and that the mere act of copying is not by itself an act of infringement. RA 8293 provides for Works not Protected under Chapter IV Sections 175 - 176, to wit:
CHAPTER IV
WORKS NOT PROTECTED
Section 175. Unprotected Subject Matter. - Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 172 and 173, no protection shall extend, under this law, to any idea, procedure, system, method or operation, concept, principle, discovery or mere data as such, even if they are expressed, explained, illustrated or embodied in a work; news of the day and other miscellaneous facts having the character of mere items of press information; or any official text of a legislative, administrative or legal nature, as well as any official translation thereof (n)
Section 176. Works of the Government. - 176.1. No copyright shall subsist in any work of the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency or office wherein the work is created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit. Such agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the payment of royalties. No prior approval or conditions shall be required for the use of any purpose of statutes, rules and regulations, and speeches, lectures, sermons, addresses, and dissertations, pronounced, read or rendered in courts of justice, before administrative agencies, in deliberative assemblies and in meetings of public character. (Sec. 9, first par., P.D. No. 49)
176.2. The author of speeches, lectures, sermons, addresses, and dissertations mentioned in the preceding paragraphs shall have the exclusive right of making a collection of his works. (n)
176.3. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, the Government is not precluded from receiving and holding copyrights transferred to it by assignment, bequest or otherwise; nor shall publication or republication by the Government in a public document of any work in which copyright is subsisting be taken to cause any abridgment or annulment of the copyright or to authorize any use or appropriation of such work without the consent of the copyright owner. (Sec. 9, third par., P.D. No. 49)
To be safe and to avoid being sued for infringement of intellectual property right in cyberspace is by simply asking permission to use the information you are about to download or copy. Medyo heavy ang penalty pag napatunayang may copyright infringement:
RA 8293 Chapter VII Section 217. Criminal Penalties. - 217.1. Any person infringing any right secured by provisions of Part IV of this Act or aiding or abetting such infringement shall be guilty of a crime punishable by:
(a) Imprisonment of one (1) year to three (3) years plus a fine ranging from Fifty thousand pesos (P50,000) to One hundred fifty thousand pesos (P150,000) for the first offense.
(b) Imprisonment of three (3) years and one (1) day to six (6) years plus a fine ranging from One hundred fifty thousand pesos (P150,000) to Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000) for the second offense.
(c) Imprisonment of six (6) years and one (1) day to nine (9) years plus a fine ranging from five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000) to One million five hundred thousand pesos (P1,500,000) for the third and subsequent offenses.
(d) In all cases, subsidiary imprisonment in cases of insolvency.
217.2. In determining the number of years of imprisonment and the amount of fine, the court shall consider the value of the infringing materials that the defendant has produced or manufactured and the damage that the copyright owner has suffered by reason of the infringement.
217.3. Any person who at the time when copyright subsists in a work has in his possession an article which he knows, or ought to know, to be an infringing copy of the work for the purpose of:
(a) Selling, letting for hire, or by way of trade offering or exposing for sale, or hire, the article;
(b) Distributing the article for purpose of trade, or for any other purpose to an extent that will prejudice the rights of the copyright owner in the work; or
(c) Trade exhibit of the article in public, shall be guilty of an offense and shall be liable on conviction to imprisonment and fine as above mentioned. (Sec. 29, P.D. No. 49a)
Now, kung kunyari yung mga kinopya niya ay included dun sa mga "Works" not protected by RA 8293, then, hindi yun illegal per se and is not legally actionable.
Pero meron din namang unwritten law ang mga contributors sa cyberspace eh and that is "not to copy" anothers work or idea without acknowledging them and this is not hard to do,right? Out of respect na lang ika nga. After all, we gain new friend/s by acknowledging their work.
Here's the link to the full text of RA 8293 http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1997/ra_8293_1997.html (http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1997/ra_8293_1997.html)
And the link to RA 10372, Amending certain provisions of RA 8293 http://www.gov.ph/2013/02/28/republic-act-no-10372/ (http://www.gov.ph/2013/02/28/republic-act-no-10372/)
-
Nag cite ba siya ng source? Usually illegal yan lalo na if ang intent is to make it look like it's yours. Pwera nalang kung binayaran mo ang author dahil freelance siya or something.
Or explicit siya sa pag sabi na feel free to use in whatever way or fashion you want and no need to give credit to the original author of the article.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
-
Internal policy ng site kung saan mo ipost at IP law kung saan mo kokopyahin ang mga mababangga mo.
-
so depende talaga sa purpose and intentions kung saan mo siya gagamitin?
-
hmmmm. halimbawa po bumili kayo ng vcd or apps tapos na detect na pirated yung copy nyo sasabihin ng computer na isa kang "victim" ng counterfieted product.
sa batas po pinapayagan ang pagkopya sa gawa ng iba para sa personal use or chraity works or for preservation of the original copy.
kung hindi mo gawing business pwedeng copyahin.
-
pagdating sa mga works sa internet.....as long as may mga links ka mentioned about the source of the article kahit ilang milyong article pa ang ilagay mo sa site mo walang kaso......kasama sya sa etiquettes set for the use of the internet.....mahirap kasi e-control ang net and di rin basta maiiwasan ang copying kaya basta namention mo ung source or at least a credit okay na okay na un
-
tama po kayo dyan...wag nating angkinin ang gawa ng iba.
-
Maganda ng topic ito lalo na sa mga manunulat dito sa PT.
In general, copy-pasting somebody else's work is plagiarism, especially if there is no attribution. Hindi po sapat na sabihin at the start or end of an article na: "credit to the original author" or something similar.
The attribution must state the source and author of the "borrowed" article. It may be in the form of a foreword, footnote, and/or bibliography.
Pasensya na mga ka-PT pero marami po dito ang nanghihiram ng article sa ibang sites, pino-post dito ng walang proper attribution.
Mayroong ding mga bodies of work na pwedeng gamitin under the "Fair Use" principle. Still proper attribution must be done, explicitly crediting the source, owner/author of the article.
It is not my intention to criticize anyone. But I think it is good practice to give proper credit where it is due, not just saying "credit to the original author / uploader".
Kung meron man po akong nasagasaan dito, hinihingi ko po ang paumanhin.
Salamat po.
Sent from my Nokia 5110 using Tapatalk (http://tapatalk.com/m?id=1)
-
any use of one's creation without permission or attribution is certainly a theft of intellectual property...no amount of justification would negate the fact of dishonesty of the one doing this pasting...
-
Hindi rin tama mag cite ng buong article as much as possible cite mo lang un text na gusto mo ihighlight then provide a foot note for reference. Research ang forte ko dati kaya pag may nakikita akong articles w/o citation mainit sa mata ko.
-
Oo bawal talaga... Plagiarism yan... Kaya kung wala kang maipost dito na original na gawa mo eh wag mo ng ituloy at sasakit lang ulo mo...
Sent from my 007 iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Hindi rin tama mag cite ng buong article as much as possible cite mo lang un text na gusto mo ihighlight then provide a foot note for reference. Research ang forte ko dati kaya pag may nakikita akong articles w/o citation mainit sa mata ko.
opo maliban sa footnote meron din tayong endnote of mismo sa article mo sya i cite. without discussing the legalities, ito po isaisip natin , hindi katangap tanggap na angkinin ang gawa ng iba. :-\
-
Barbero yata tawag dyan :)
sent from ... ahmmm .. .. .. sorry I forgot .. :D
-
considered piracy to.
>:D
Sent from my LT26ii using Tapatalk